Chronosync hangs how to#
Chronosync hangs install#
Chronosync hangs mac#

It’s great for testing or playing around.īut I do networking for a job. I’ve used VirtualBox and Parallels on a Mac.

Chronosync hangs mac#

It’s actually just as fast and as easy to setup on a Mac as MacOS.

Chronosync hangs install#

I haven’t seen anything as nice in the PC world and although I’m sure Nethserver can do much the same, it will be a lot of setting up and monitoring.īut let me know where I’m does install “as an OS”, as you term it. Its all set up and works very well automatically. We use ChronoSync extensively to backup Macs and hard drives to on and off-site locations.

Chronosync hangs how to#

So I’ll also need new HDs, learn how to mount them, learn how to share to Macs via SMB and transfer the data over.īackup is the other thing I know how to do on a Mac. It took me a couple of days just to mount one hard drive for NS to use as a backup. You all may do this all the time and find it easy.

You can’t just plug a new hard drive in, there’a a whole bunch of command line fiddling about to mount it. If I did this I don’t really need a virtualiser, do I? I can just install NS on the machine. Yes, I have thought of a “PC”, an Intel NUC perhaps.

This arrangement could ease a lot of issues that can happens with virtual machines if the sysadmin is not familiar with some of their issues.Ī HP Microserver Gen 10 gives even more bang for your buck I don’t know what’s your goal in the future for installation, but considering that option “sub optimal”, a good used business desktop PC with a consumer-grade SSD and a bunch of ram could serve you quite good as a test server, and if users are few, even for “starter” production environment. And quite janky if not managed correctly (storage management on the host side is far less intuitive than other products) VirtualBox is a quite nice product (and freely available for MacOSX, AFAIK, not the same for VMWare Fusion) but it’s just… tool-less sometimes. Many Proxmox fans, some ESXi/ESX users, few KVM.Īs a desktop virtualizer i use VMWare Player (my computer is windows based). The shared experience about VirtualBox on this forum is quite non-existant. But they bill a month at a time, and they also bill a nominal setup charge for the VPS, so they aren’t nearly as suitable for a quick test.Īre you saying don’t run a production system under any virtualisation or you don’t like VirtualBox in particular? If you’d be keeping the VM around for a while, I’d look at Contabo instead you get a lot more bang for your buck on the VPS. They only bill for the time the droplet exists, so particularly for quick testing, this can be very inexpensive. Once you’re satisfied with the results, destroy the droplet. If the testing is something that wouldn’t take much time, I’d seriously look at Digital Ocean–set up a CentOS 7 droplet, install Neth over that, and do your testing. If your testing is going to require accessing the server over the Internet, consider spinning up a VPS.If your testing can be done over the LAN, great–no port forwarding is needed in that case.As you surmise, however, you can’t forward the same port to two different places. But yes, you can have any number of Neth instances running at the same time (as long as your system resources will support it)–I have two Neth VMs, and another instance on dedicated hardware, running on my LAN right now. I really wouldn’t recommend running a production system under VirtualBox in any event.